The question of whether you can assign investment oversight to a third party, particularly within the context of a trust, is a common one for those seeking to ensure their assets are managed responsibly after their passing or during periods of incapacity. The short answer is yes, you absolutely can, but it’s crucial to understand the legal framework and best practices involved. Assigning investment oversight isn’t simply about handing over control; it’s about establishing a clear, legally sound structure that protects your beneficiaries and aligns with your financial goals. A properly drafted trust document, alongside a well-defined investment policy statement, is paramount. Approximately 60% of high-net-worth individuals utilize third-party investment managers to oversee portions of their portfolios, according to a recent survey by a leading wealth management firm. This highlights the increasing trend of delegating investment responsibilities to professionals.
What are the legal requirements for delegating trust investment duties?
Legally, most states, including California where Steve Bliss practices, allow trustees to delegate investment duties, provided it’s done prudently and in accordance with the trust document and applicable laws. The Uniform Prudent Investor Act (UPIA), adopted by a majority of states, sets the standard of care for trustees. This act emphasizes that trustees must invest and manage trust assets as a prudent investor would, considering the purposes of the trust, the beneficiaries’ needs, and the overall risk tolerance. Delegation is permissible as long as the trustee exercises reasonable care, skill, and caution in selecting, monitoring, and removing the third-party investment manager. The trustee retains ultimate responsibility, even when delegating duties, and cannot simply wash their hands of the process. Furthermore, the trust document should specifically grant the trustee the power to delegate investment responsibilities.
How does a trustee balance their duty of care when delegating investment oversight?
Balancing the duty of care while delegating is a multi-faceted process. First, thorough due diligence on potential investment managers is essential. This includes verifying their credentials, experience, regulatory history, and investment philosophy. Second, a clear and detailed investment policy statement (IPS) should be established, outlining investment objectives, risk tolerance, asset allocation, and performance benchmarks. The IPS acts as a roadmap for the investment manager and a tool for ongoing monitoring. Third, regular communication with the investment manager is vital. The trustee should receive periodic reports on portfolio performance, asset allocation, and investment strategy. Finally, the trustee must actively review the manager’s performance against the IPS and make adjustments if necessary. “A trustee’s job isn’t to pick stocks, it’s to pick the right people to manage the assets,” as often stated by Steve Bliss during estate planning consultations.
What are the potential liabilities for a trustee who delegates investment oversight?
Despite delegating duties, a trustee remains liable for any losses resulting from their own negligence or failure to properly oversee the investment manager. This means the trustee can be held personally liable if they choose an incompetent manager, fail to monitor performance, or ignore red flags. For instance, if a trustee delegates to a manager with a history of fraud, or fails to investigate concerning performance trends, they could be held responsible for any resulting losses. Liability can be mitigated by documenting all due diligence, maintaining clear communication with the manager, and adhering to the terms of the trust document and the UPIA. Furthermore, securing trustee liability insurance can provide an additional layer of protection. It’s estimated that trustee litigation is on the rise, with increasing complexity in investment strategies and regulatory landscapes.
Can a trust document restrict or prohibit the delegation of investment oversight?
Absolutely. A trust document is a powerful tool, and the grantor (the person creating the trust) can tailor the terms to their specific wishes. The grantor can expressly prohibit the trustee from delegating investment oversight, requiring them to manage the assets directly. Alternatively, the grantor can restrict delegation to specific types of investment managers or impose certain conditions. For example, the trust might require the trustee to select a manager with a specific expertise or geographic focus. The trust document can also outline the process for selecting and monitoring the manager, ensuring that it aligns with the grantor’s vision. “A well-drafted trust anticipates potential issues and provides clear guidance for the trustee,” Steve Bliss often emphasizes.
What happens when an investment manager fails to adhere to the investment policy statement?
When an investment manager deviates from the agreed-upon investment policy statement, it’s a serious issue that requires immediate attention. The trustee has a duty to intervene and ensure that the manager is brought back into alignment. This might involve issuing a written warning, demanding corrective action, or ultimately terminating the relationship. Documentation of all communication and actions is crucial. Ignoring such deviations could expose the trustee to liability. A case came to Steve Bliss’ attention involving a trustee who allowed a manager to engage in highly speculative investments, despite a conservative IPS. The resulting losses significantly impacted the beneficiaries, and the trustee faced a costly legal battle. It’s a reminder that consistent monitoring and enforcement of the IPS are non-negotiable.
How can a trustee effectively monitor the performance of a third-party investment manager?
Effective monitoring goes beyond simply reviewing quarterly performance reports. It requires a proactive and comprehensive approach. The trustee should establish clear performance benchmarks, track progress against those benchmarks, and regularly analyze investment performance. They should also scrutinize the manager’s fees and expenses, ensuring they are reasonable and transparent. Conducting periodic on-site visits or conference calls can provide valuable insights into the manager’s operations and investment strategy. Seeking independent performance reviews from a qualified consultant can provide an objective assessment. “Think of the trustee as the conductor of an orchestra, ensuring all the instruments – including the investment manager – are playing in harmony,” as Steve Bliss explains to his clients.
Let’s talk about a situation where things went wrong…
Old Man Hemlock, a client of Steve Bliss, created a trust to provide for his grandchildren. He appointed his daughter, Clara, as trustee and allowed her to delegate investment oversight. Clara, overwhelmed with her own career, chose an investment manager based solely on a friend’s recommendation, without conducting thorough due diligence. The manager, unfortunately, turned out to be a fraud, and the trust assets were quickly depleted. The grandchildren were left with almost nothing. Clara, devastated and facing legal action, sought Steve’s guidance. It was a painful lesson in the importance of careful selection and ongoing monitoring.
How can a trustee ensure a positive outcome?
Following the Hemlock case, Steve worked closely with Clara to develop a revised trust administration plan. They implemented a rigorous due diligence process for selecting a new investment manager, including background checks, reference checks, and a review of their investment philosophy and track record. They established a detailed investment policy statement that clearly outlined investment objectives, risk tolerance, and performance benchmarks. Most importantly, they scheduled regular meetings with the manager to review performance and discuss any concerns. This time, the trust thrived, providing a secure financial future for the grandchildren. This success story highlighted the power of proactive planning, careful oversight, and adherence to best practices. A trustee who understands their duties and takes them seriously can provide lasting benefits to the beneficiaries of the trust.
About Steven F. Bliss Esq. at San Diego Probate Law:
Secure Your Family’s Future with San Diego’s Trusted Trust Attorney. Minimize estate taxes with stress-free Probate. We craft wills, trusts, & customized plans to ensure your wishes are met and loved ones protected.
My skills are as follows:
● Probate Law: Efficiently navigate the court process.
● Probate Law: Minimize taxes & distribute assets smoothly.
● Trust Law: Protect your legacy & loved ones with wills & trusts.
● Bankruptcy Law: Knowledgeable guidance helping clients regain financial stability.
● Compassionate & client-focused. We explain things clearly.
● Free consultation.
Map To Steve Bliss at San Diego Probate Law: https://g.co/kgs/WzT6443
Address:
San Diego Probate Law3914 Murphy Canyon Rd, San Diego, CA 92123
(858) 278-2800
Key Words Related To San Diego Probate Law:
| living trust attorney | wills and trust lawyer | wills attorney |
| conservatorship | living trust attorney | estate planning lawyer |
| dynasty trust attorney | probate lawyer | revocable living trust attorney |
Feel free to ask Attorney Steve Bliss about: “What is a QTIP trust?” or “What is ancillary probate and when is it necessary?” and even “Who should be my beneficiary on life insurance policies?” Or any other related questions that you may have about Probate or my trust law practice.